When was prop 8 voted on

As in the earlier cases of California and Massachusetts, the ruling of the court was in favor of the declaration of unconstitutionality by only one vote. Those who see same-sex marriage as a civil rights issue take the view that the legalization of same-sex marriage is part of an inevitable process of extending rights to disadvantaged groups.

Those who oppose same-sex marriage contend that gay people are not a disadvantaged group under accepted legal definitions, and are not entitled to special treatment. Opponents see the legalization of same-sex marriage as an attack on the family and the social order, and cast the issue in moral and religious terms.

This timeline highlights changes to the California civil and criminal codes that defined the path toward same-sex marriage in California. These television advertisements were funded and produced by the political committees in favor of and in opposition to Proposition 8. Their inclusion here is for informational purposes only and is in no way meant to advocate one side or the other of the debate. Campaign contributions database Secretary of State website.

Campaign contributions database - total Secretary of State website Select "Nov. Same-sex marriage timeline , San Francisco Chronicle, published May 18, Ballotpedia entry on Prop 8. Gay marriages, county by county Los Angeles Times. Tracking Prop 8 contributions Los Angeles Times. Center for Governmental Studies Voter Minute.

About Contact Visit. Make a Gift Planned Gifts. Proposition 8. Election: November 4, : General. Official Results. Yes votes: 7,, No votes: 6,, Introduction The traditional and predominant legal stance in most of the 50 states is that marriage, as legally defined, can be viewed only as a legally recognized union of one man and one woman.

California Developments This timeline highlights changes to the California civil and criminal codes that defined the path toward same-sex marriage in California. Proposition 8 added a new section to the state Constitution which provides that "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. On November 19, , the Supreme Court agreed to hear those cases.

The court directed the parties to brief and argue the following issues: 1 Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution? Justices also reject the argument that voters had been misled when they signed petitions to put it on the ballot.

The decision virtually ensures another fight at the ballot box over marriage rights for gays. Gay rights activists say they may ask voters to repeal the marriage ban as early as next year, and opponents have pledged to fight any such effort. The suit calls for an injunction against Proposition 8 and the immediate reinstatement of marriage rights for same-sex couples.

District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker said Proposition 8, passed by voters in November , violated the federal constitutional rights of gays and lesbians to marry the partners of their choice.. His ruling is expected to be appealed to the U.

Supreme Court. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker keeps same-sex marriages on hold for at least another week. The justices will then have 90 days to decide whether state law gives proponents of ballot measures legal standing to defend them in court. Supreme Court to rule on gay marriage. June 5, The U. LAPD 8 hours ago. Back to Article.

Close Menu. Search for:. Follow Us Facebook Twitter Instagram.